So Microsoft just announced they're building a "humanist superintelligence." Not just any superintelligence, mind you – a humanist one. Because apparently, when you're in an arms race to build god-tier AI, the most important thing is to make sure your press release sounds like it was written by a philosophy grad student.
Let me get this straight: Mustafa Suleyman, the guy who co-founded DeepMind (sold to Google) and then Inflection (sold to Microsoft), is now heading Microsoft's MAI Superintelligence Team. The man has made a career out of building AI companies and selling them to big tech, and now he's going to build superintelligence "that serves humanity." Sure. And I'm going to start a diet on Monday.
The Talent War Nobody Asked For
Here's where it gets spicy: Meta is throwing $100 million signing bonuses at AI researchers. One hundred. Million. Dollars. For a signing bonus. Meanwhile, my signing bonus at my last job was a branded water bottle and access to the "premium" coffee machine that still dispensed liquid sadness.
Microsoft won't say if they're matching Meta's offers, but they're "putting a lot of money" into this. Translation: they're absolutely matching those offers, they just don't want to say it out loud because even they know it sounds insane.
The OpenAI Insurance Policy
The most interesting part? Microsoft is diversifying away from OpenAI. They own $135 billion worth of OpenAI, they power ChatGPT on Azure, they've integrated it into everything from Bing to your grandma's Word documents – and now they're quietly testing Google and Anthropic models.
This is the corporate equivalent of staying in a relationship but downloading dating apps "just to see what's out there." Microsoft knows what every Solutions Engineer learns on day one: never bet your entire infrastructure on a single vendor. Even if that vendor is your $135 billion strategic partner.
Humanist Superintelligence: The Branding We Deserve
Suleyman says they're not building an "infinitely capable generalist" AI because that would be uncontrollable. Instead, they want "specialist systems" with "superhuman performance" in specific domains like medicine and energy.
You know what that sounds like? Every other AI project announced in the last three years. "We're not building scary general AI, we're building helpful superhuman AI that will revolutionize healthcare!" It's the same pitch, just with better copy.
To be fair, focusing on specific domains is actually smart engineering. AlphaFold proved that specialist AI can solve real problems. But let's not pretend this is some noble philosophical stance. Microsoft wants controllable, productizable AI systems they can sell to enterprises. The "humanism" is just good marketing.
The Two-Year Medical Miracle
My favorite part: Suleyman predicts expert-level medical diagnostics AI in "the next two or three years."
As someone who's spent years in enterprise software, let me translate: "We hope to have a MVP demo that works 70% of the time in controlled conditions within three years, followed by five years of regulatory approval, pilot programs, and convincing hospitals to integrate it with their systems that still run on Windows XP."
But hey, optimism is free.
The Uncomfortable Truth
Here's what's real: Microsoft is doing exactly what they should do. They're hedging their OpenAI bet, competing for talent, and focusing on practical applications. That's just good business.
The "humanist superintelligence" branding? That's for investors who are starting to wonder if the $135 billion OpenAI investment will ever generate returns. It's for regulators who are getting nervous about AI concentration. It's for employees who want to feel like they're building something meaningful, not just another tool for Microsoft to print money.
And you know what? That's fine. We can acknowledge the corporate theatrics while still recognizing that specialist AI in medicine, energy, and materials science could genuinely help people. Both things can be true.
Just don't expect me to believe that the company that brought us Clippy has suddenly discovered the meaning of humanism.
What do you think? Is Microsoft's "humanist" approach genuine innovation or just premium-tier branding? Let me know in the comments.
